BOARD MEETING DATE: October 10, 1997 AGENDA NO. 15


PROPOSAL:

Execute Contracts for AQIP for Second Quarter of 1997

SYNOPSIS:

Rule 2202 - On-Road Motor Vehicle Mitigation Options was adopted on December 8, 1995. As one compliance strategy, Rule 2202 allows employers to invest in the AQIP. Monies received are placed in a restricted account to fund programs that result in equivalent emission reductions that would otherwise have been achieved by the participating employers. Staff evaluated the proposals received during the second quarter of 1997 and this action is to recommend one for funding. The adjusted amount available for this quarter is $463,121.

COMMITTEE:

Mobile Source, September 26, 1997, Recommended for Approval

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Authorize the Chairman to execute a contract for a total amount not to exceed $292,500 from the AQIP Special Revenue Fund to obtain mobile source emission reductions from Eco-Scrap.

Barry R. Wallerstein, D.Env.
Acting Executive Officer


Background

The Rule 2202 AQIP allows all employers to participate by electing to invest in an AQMD-administered restricted fund. Investment can be either $60 annually per employee reporting to the worksite during the 6:00 a.m. to 10:00 a.m. peak window, or $125 triennially per employee. The restricted monies are to be used by the AQMD to fund proposals that achieve mobile source emission reductions that would otherwise have been achieved by implementing a rideshare program. This Board letter contains a discussion regarding the dispersal of funds from the AQIP compliance option for the second quarter of 1997.

Upon registering under this option and submitting the designated investment amount, an employer is considered to be in compliance with the rule and there is no need for the employer to take further action to reduce mobile source emissions. The collected monies are used to fund alternative mobile source emission reduction strategies that reduce mobile source emissions at a more cost-effective rate which could potentially result in greater overall emission reductions.

The second quarter of 1997 submittal period ended on June 30, 1997 with 50 employers participating in the AQIP program. The total AQIP funds received during this period was $270,563, which includes both annual and triennial participants (see Attachment 1). In addition, $46,889 is being carried forward from the previous quarters and $145,669 is available from the accrued interest. Therefore, the total amount available for this quarter is $463,121. Staff recommends that $292,500 be used to purchase emission reductions to satisfy the one-year and the three-year requirements.

Proposal Evaluation

During the second quarter of 1997, eight proposals were received requesting funds ranging from $4,427 to $877,500. The project proposals received can be grouped in four categories: old-vehicle scrapping, alternative fuel vehicle deployment, transportation demand management, and electric-powered bicycles. Attachment 2 gives a summary of emission reduction targets and the emission reduction credit balance. Attachment 3 gives a summary of each proposal received and funds requested. Attachment 4 provides an overall summary of the proposals by type. It lists the proposals received, funds requested, total proposal costs, and emission reductions expected from each proposal.

All proposals submitted were reviewed and scored based on the information in the proposal as submitted to the AQMD, and according to the selection criteria described in the RFP. The evaluation panel consisted of 5 AQMD employees: Catherine Wasikowski, Connie Day, Ernie Lopez, Shashi Singeetham, from Transportation Programs, and Dave Coel, from Planning. Two panel members are Hispanic, two are Caucasian, and one is Asian-Indian. Three panel members are male, and two are female. Attachment 5 discusses the selection criteria, the scoring process, and the overall ratings for each proposal.

The following proposal is recommended for approval:

Eco-Scrap Option 3 $292,500

Eco-Scrap proposes to generate MSERCs through an old vehicle scrapping program. Five options have been offered with option #3 being selected.. This proposal covers the emission reduction requirement of the quarter and will provide emission credits within 90 days of the contract. The Eco-Scrap proposal ranked second but is recommended for funding because the firm that ranked first has two AQIP contracts that total $737,300 with work pending on both.

For the second quarter of 1997, the total recommended funding amount is $292,500 (see Attachment 6, Table 2). Any remaining AQIP funds would be held for future proposal funding in subsequent quarters. Both annual and triennial AQIP emission reduction targets for each performance target zone and for all participants during the second quarter 1997 will be met by the recommended proposal.

Proposition 209 Compliance

On August 28, 1997, Proposition 209 went into effect when a stay of enforcement was lifted. Proposition 209 prohibits granting of preferential treatment based upon race, ethnicity, color, sex or national origin in the operation of public employment, public education, or public contracting. On September 19, 1997, the Administrative Committee considered options for amendment of the District’s contracting policies to conform with the Proposition. The matter will be further considered at the Committee’s next meeting. In the meantime to ensure compliance with the Proposition, the Committee recommended for adoption an Interim Contracting Policy. This policy will be considered for adoption as part of another agenda item at the October 10, 1997, Board Meeting. The proposed Interim Policy eliminates the granting of preference points based upon race or gender and only requires a good faith effort to subcontract with minority and women-owned businesses if subcontracts are to be let, when contracts are funded in whole or in part by EPA grant funds. (Proposition 209 does not prohibit actions necessary to maintain eligibility for federal funding.) In addition, in compliance with federal requirements, local preference points are allowed only if the contract does not involve federal funding. If the Interim Policy is adopted by the Board, this contract award will be based on that policy. The remainder of the District’s Contracting and Purchasing Policy and Consultant Selection Policy remains unchanged.

Outreach

In accordance with the AQMD’s consulting and contracting policies, a public notice advertising the RFP and inviting bids was published in the following publications:

1. Antelope Valley Press
2. The Black Voice News
3. Chinese Daily News
4. Eastern Group Publications
5. El Chicano
6. The Excelsior
7. Inland Empire Hispanic News
8. Inland Valley Daily Bulletin
9. Korea Central Daily
10. La Opinion
11. La Voz
12. Los Angeles Daily News
13. Los Angeles Sentinel
14. Los Angeles Times
15. M/W/DVBE Source
16. Orange County Register
17. Palm Springs Desert Sun
18. Philippine News
19. Precinct Reporter
20. Rafu Shimpo
21. Riverside Press Enterprise
22. San Bernardino Sun
23. Santa Clarita Signal
24. State of California Contracts Register.

Additionally, potential bidders were identified through Los Angeles County’s Directory of Certified Minority, Women, Disadvantaged and Disabled Veterans Business Enterprises; the Directory of Certified Firms published by the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority; the Inland Area Opportunity Pages Ethnic/Women Business & Professional Directory; the Caltrans electronic bulletin board listing of Disadvantaged and Women Business Enterprises; the AQMD’s own electronic listing of certified minority vendors; and AQMD Purchasing’s mailing list. Copies of the RFP were mailed to the Black and Latino Legislative Caucuses and various minority chambers of commerce and business associations; and were placed on the Internet at AQMD’s Web site [http://www.aqmd.gov "Business and Job Opportunities"] and on AQMD’s bidder’s 24-hour telephone message line. Public service announcements were sent to local radio, TV, and cable stations.

A Bidders Conference was convened at the AQMD on June 5, 1997 to highlight the requirements of the proposals and to answer questions from the 13 prospective bidders in attendance.

Resource Impact

Not Applicable

Attachments

1. AQIP Funding and Participation

2. Summary of Emission Reduction Targets and Credit Balances

3. Summary of AQIP Proposals Received

4. Summary of Proposals By Type

5. Summary of Proposal Ratings

6. Recommendation for Funding

aqip2-97.doc

ATTACHMENT 1

AQIP - Second Quarter 1997

TABLE 1

Funds Received (as of June. 30, 1997)

Program

Funding

Annual

$129,173

Triennial

$141,390

Total Second Quarter, 1997

$270,563

TABLE 2

Annual Participation

County

Worksites

Employees

Contribution

Los Angeles

9

1,634

$98,034

Orange

3

519

$31,139

Riverside

0

0

$0

San Bernardino

0

0

$0

TOTAL

12

2,153

$129,173

TABLE 3

Triennial Participation

County

Worksites

Employees

Contribution

Los Angeles

22

139

$8,333

Orange

12

815

$82,382

Riverside

2

5

$300

San Bernardino

2

403

$50,375

TOTAL

38

1,362

$141,390

ATTACHMENT 2

AQIP - Second Quarter 1997

TABLE 1

Emission Reduction Targets (Adjusted Per SB 836)

(Pounds)

Program

VOC

NOx

CO

1997

16,592

12,498

128,539

1998

5,845

4,407

45,107

1999

5,113

4,109

39,981

TOTAL
3-Year Target

27,550

21,014

213,627

TABLE 2

Emission Reduction Credit Balances (As of June 30, 1997)

(Pounds)

Pollutant/
Year

Emission Bank
(End of 1st Qtr. 97)

Starting Balance

Emission
Reduction Target
2nd-Qtr. 1997

Emission Credits From Recommended
Proposal
(see Attachment 6)

New Balance
(After Funding
Recommended
Proposal)


a

b

c

=(a-b+c)

VOC





1997

321,831

16,592

22,833

328,072

1998

252,313

5,845

22,833

269,301

1999

74,489

5,113

22,833

92,209

NOx





1997

176,545

12,498

13,000

177,047

1998

163,986

4,407

13,000

172,579

1999

36,351

4,109

13,000

45,242

CO





1997

2,723,051

128,539

176,833

2,771,345

1998

1,957,120

45,107

176,833

2,088,846

1999

522,449

39,981

176,833

659,301

ATTACHMENT 3

Summary

Air Quality Investment Program

Proposals Received - Second Quarter 1997

The following proposals were received in response to the AQIP Request for Proposals (RFP) on or before July 3, 1997. The proposals are not listed by classification or rank.

1. Ecology Auto Wrecking $282,500

County: All

Ecology Auto Wrecking proposes to generate MSERCs through an old-vehicle scrapping program and provide triennial credits. Based on the information provided, the proposal is estimated to have a cost-effectiveness of $1.62 per pound. (Not funded: Ranked third in cost effectiveness.)

2. Pick Your Part Auto Wrecking $245,250

County: All

Pick Your Part Auto Wrecking proposes to generate MSERCs by eliminating pre-1982 vehicles through an old-vehicle scrapping program at a cost-effectiveness of $1.40 per pound. (Not funded: Ranked first in cost-effectiveness but was not funded as the vendor has two AQIP contracts with work pending on both.)

3. Anaheim Transportation Network, The Walt Disney Co., Option A $280,360

and the City of Anaheim Option B $280,360

County: Orange

The Anaheim Transportation Network proposes a clean fuel flexible rail feeder system from Orange and Anaheim stadium rail stations to Anaheim resort, downtown and stadium business centers. Four 28-passenger CNG vehicles will meet arriving and departing Metrolink trains. In Option A, the vehicles are equipped with optional lower emission CNG engines and in Option B, the vehicles are equipped with standard CARB-certified standard CNG engines. (Not funded: Low cost-effectiveness.)

4. Market-Based Solutions, Inc. $245,000

County: All

Market-Based Solutions proposes to generate MSERCs through an old-vehicle scrapping program. This proposal offers all the required emissions for the quarter at the cost-effectiveness of $1.67 per pound. (Not funded: Ranked fourth among all old-vehicle scrapping proposals.)

5. Eco-Scrap Option 1 $97,110

Option 2 $248,040

Option 3 $292,500

Option 4 $585,000

Option 5 $877,500

County: All

Eco-Scrap proposes to generate MSERCs through an old vehicle scrapping program. Five options have been offered. All the options have a cost-effectiveness of $1.60 per pound and cover the emission reduction requirement of the quarter. (Funded Option 3: Ranked second in cost-effectiveness among old-vehicle scrapping proposals. The emission credits are being surrendered within 90 days of the contract and the firm has no pending AQIP contracts.)

6. County of Los Angeles Public Library $250,000

Telecommunity Centers Project County: Los Angeles

This proposal seeks to develop nine Library Telecommunity Centers in two phases for the purpose of integrating telecommuting/teleconferencing technologies into libraries which represent a wide geographical spread in each of the Supervisorial Districts across Los Angeles County. (Not funded: Low cost-effectiveness.)

7. Santa Monica College Police Department $4,427

County: Los Angeles

The Santa Monica College Police Department proposes to reduce emissions by replacing some of their gasoline-powered patrol vehicles with two electric-powered bicycles for approximately 9,700 hours of use per year. (Not funded: Incomplete proposal.)

8. Whittier College $200,000

County: Los Angeles

Whittier College proposes to reduce emissions by deploying electric bicycles, constructing electric bicycle pathways and installing appropriate bike racks. (Not funded: Incomplete proposal.)

ATTACHMENT 4

AQIP - Second Quarter 1997

Proposal Summary

(By Type)

ALTERNATIVE FUEL

VEHICLES


AQIP
Funding
Request


Total
Program

Cost


AQIP
Program
Period



Emission Reduction Commitments
(lbs.)






VOC

NOx

CO

Anaheim Transportation Network, The Walt Disney Co., and the City of Anaheim
- Option A: CNG vehicles built to CARB optional lower emission standards

$280,360

$645,890

Triennial

12,763

4,120

91,095

Anaheim Transportation Network, The Walt Disney Co., and the City of Anaheim
- Option B: CNG vehicles built to CARB standard emission specifications

$280,360

$645,890

Triennial

10,901

3,500

53,342


OLD-VEHICLE SCRAPPING


AQIP
Funding
Request


Total
Program

Cost


AQIP
Program
Period



Emission Reduction Commitments
(lbs.)






VOC

NOx

CO

Ecology Auto Wrecking

$282,500

$282,500

Triennial

63,300

38,625

510,000

Pick Your Part Auto Wrecking

$245,250

$245,250

Triennial

62,778

38,670

516,600

Market-Based Solutions

$245,000

$245,000

Triennial

45,000

33,900

474,600

Eco-Scrap - Option 1

$97,110

$97,110

Triennial

22,471

12,948

176,126

Eco-Scrap - Option 2

$248,040

$248,040

Triennial

58,088

33,072

449,864

Eco-Scrap - Option 3

$292,500

$292,500

Triennial

68,500

39,000

530,500

Eco-Scrap - Option 4

$585,000

$585,000

Triennial

137,000

78,000

1,061,000

Eco-Scrap - Option 5

$877,500

$877,500

Triennial

205,500

117,000

1,591,500


TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT


AQIP
Funding
Request


Total
Program

Cost


AQIP
Program
Period



Emission Reduction Commitments
(lbs.)






VOC

NOx

CO

County of Los Angeles Public Library Telecommunity Centers Project

$250,000

Not
specified

Triennial

4,216.1

4,110.7

73,781.4


ELECTRIC-POWERED
BICYCLES


AQIP
Funding
Request


Total
Program

Cost


AQIP
Program
Period



Emission Reduction Commitments
(lbs.)






VOC

NOx

CO

Santa Monica College Police Department

$4,427.38

$5843.38

Triennial

66.3

48.9

509.1

Whittier College

$200,000

$200,000

Triennial

21.9

16.2

168.6

ATTACHMENT 5

Summary

AQIP - Second Quarter 1997

Proposal Ratings

All proposals submitted were reviewed and scored according to the selection criteria in the Board-approved RFP. The RFP selection criteria is an evaluation process consisting of two steps: Step 1 - Technical, and Step 2 - Cost and Other Factors. Proposals scoring a minimum of 70 points for technical criteria are then scored for cost and other factors. Proposals that score below 70 points are not scored any further and would be scored zero for the total score. The resulting total and average scores are summarized in the table below.

PROPOSALS

PROPOSAL TYPE

TOTAL SCORE*

AVG. SCORE

Pick Your Part Auto Wrecking

Old-Vehicle Scrapping

443.0

88.6

Eco-Scrap - Option 1

Old-Vehicle Scrapping

408.5

81.7

Eco-Scrap - Option 2

Old-Vehicle Scrapping

409.0

81.8

Eco-Scrap - Option 3

Old-Vehicle Scrapping

406.0

81.2

Eco-Scrap - Option 4

Old-Vehicle Scrapping

401.0

80.2

Eco-Scrap - Option 5

Old-Vehicle Scrapping

396.0

79.2

Ecology Auto Wrecking

Old-Vehicle Scrapping

382.5

76.5

Market-Based Solutions

Old-Vehicle Scrapping

371.5

74.3

Anaheim Transportation Network, The Walt Disney Company and the City of Anaheim - Option A

Clean Fuel Flexible Rail Feeder System, Using Optional Lower-Emission CNG Vehicles

253.0

50.6

Anaheim Transportation Network, The Walt Disney Company and the City of Anaheim - Option B

Clean Fuel Flexible Rail Feeder System, Using Standard CNG Vehicles

239.0

47.8

County of Los Angeles
Public Library -
Telecommunity Centers Project

Telecommunity Centers

167.0

33.4

Santa Monica College
Police Department

Use of Electric-Powered Bicycles

0.0

0.0

Whittier College

Purchase Electric Bicycles, Bike Racks And Create Bike Pathways

0.0

0.0

* Aggregated total score from all five members of the proposal evaluation panel.

ATTACHMENT 6

AQIP -Second Quarter 1997

TABLE 1

Proposal Recommended for Funding

Anticipated Emission Reductions

(Pounds/Year)

PROGRAM

VOC

NOx

CO

Eco-Scrap - Option 3




Total First Year Emission Reductions

22,833

13,000

176,833

Total Second Year Emission Reductions

22,833

13,000

176,833

Total Third Year Emission Reductions

22,833

13,000

176,833

TABLE 2

Proposal Recommended for Funding

Funding Request

PROGRAM

AQIP Funding
Request

Total
Program Cost

Eco-Scrap - Option 3

$292,500

$292,500

/ / /