AQMD logo South Coast Air Quality Management District


BOARD MEETING DATE: December 15, 2000 AGENDA NO. 9




PROPOSAL: 

Approve Transit Bus, Heavy-Duty Vehicle, and Transportation Control Measure Projects as Part of FY 2000-01 AB 2766 Discretionary Fund Work Program; Authorize MSRC Authority to Adjust Project Costs Up 5%; and Authorize Board Chairman Authority to Execute Agreements

SYNOPSIS: 

As part of its FY 2000-01 AB 2766 Discretionary Fund Work Program, the MSRC issued six RFPs and one RFQ seeking proposals for transit bus, heavy-duty vehicle and TCM projects. The seven solicitations closed at 5:00 p.m. on October 5, 2000, at which time 46 eligible proposals had been received. At this time the MSRC requests Board approval of several projects as part of the FY 2000-01 AB 2766 Discretionary Fund Work Program. The MSRC also requests authority to adjust project costs up to 5 percent and authority for the Board Chairman to execute agreements.

COMMITTEE: 

Mobile Source Air Pollution Reduction Review Committee,
November 30, 2000, Approved Unanimously

RECOMMENDED ACTIONS:

  1. Approve the FY 2000-01 AB 2766 Discretionary Fund Work Program, as set forth in this Board letter and described in the attachments, totaling $17,276,563, broken down as follows:
  1. Allocate $12,276,563 to fund 29 transit bus, heavy-duty vehicle, and TCM projects;

  2. Continue to allocate $2 million to light-duty buydown incentives as part of the FY 2000-01 AB 2766 Discretionary Fund Work Program; and

  3. Continue to allocate $3 million of the FY 2000-01 AB 2766 Discretionary Fund Work Program for the Alternative Fuels Subvention Fund Match Program, with specific projects funded under this program to be approved by the AQMD Governing Board at a later date.
  1. Authorize the Board Chairman the authority to execute agreements with the proposers as set forth in this Board letter and the attachments for the FY 2000-01 Work Program;

  2. Authorize MSRC the ability to adjust up to an additional 5%, as necessary, the funding of individual projects included in the attachments; and

  3. Authorize the MSRC to withdraw approval of individual projects in cases where bidders are not able to successfully negotiate a contract; unused funds will return to the Discretionary Fund for distribution to future work programs.

Mayor William G. Kleindienst
Chair, MSRC


Background

In September 1990 Assembly Bill 2766 was signed into law (Health & Safety Code Sections 44220-44247) authorizing the imposition of an annual $4 motor vehicle registration fee to fund the implementation of programs exclusively to reduce air pollution from motor vehicles. AB 2766 provides that 30 percent of the annual $4 vehicle registration fee subvened to the AQMD be placed into a Discretionary Fund account to be allocated pursuant to a work program developed and adopted by the MSRC and approved by the AQMD Governing Board.

At its August 18, 2000 meeting the AQMD Governing Board approved in concept the FY 2000-01 AB 2766 Discretionary Fund Work Program, including the release of six RFPs and one RFQ, as follows:

blue checkmark TCM Programs ($1 million target funding)

blue checkmark Clean Fuels Programs ($13.5 million target funding)

Outreach

In accordance with the AQMD's consulting and contracting policies, a public notice advertising these RFPs and RFQ was published on two different days in 25 newspapers and publications, including several targeting minorities.

The RFPs and RFQ were placed on the MSRC's website, which went on-line July 1, 2000, at "http://www.msrc-cleanair.org". They were also placed on the AQMD's website at "http://www.aqamd.gov" under the "Business and Job Opportunities" icon, and information was included about the RFP/Qs on the AQMD's 24-hour telephone message line for bidders at (909) 396-2724.

In addition to the AQMD's standard practices, a brochure announcing these funding opportunities was mailed to over 1,600 interested parties on the MSRC's mailing list, as well as to the Black and Latino Legislative Caucuses, City Managers, Chambers of Commerce, the AQMD's Ethnic Community Advisory Group, and business associations. A targeted mailing list of bicycle vendors throughout California was assembled for a specialized mailing of the Regional Electric-Assist Bicycle Incentive RFQ, and MSRC staff obtained a list from the AQMD’s Transportation Programs division containing interested parties and rideshare groups for a specialized mailing of the Voluntary Employer-Based Rideshare Incentive RFP.

In addition, the MSRC's Heavy-Duty Technical Outreach consultants, a team of heavy-duty vehicle experts, conducted individual outreach to the smaller municipal transit agencies to encourage better participation under the transit bus program.

More than 250 copies of the seven solicitations were mailed to interested parties by MSRC staff. Another dozen or more were e-mailed to potential bidders by MSRC staff. In addition, interested parties took advantage of the MSRC's website and registered online to download copies of the RFPs and RFQ.

Bidders' Conferences

To assist potential bidders in submitting qualified proposals, a technical workshop for the smaller municipal transit agencies and first-time transit applicants was conducted in August and individual bidders’ conferences for each solicitation were conducted in early September. Over 60 individuals attended the workshop and conferences.

Proposals Received and Evaluation Process

The seven solicitations closed at 5:00 p.m. on October 5, 2000, at which time 47 proposals had been received (one of which was later deemed ineligible because it did not fit the category under which it applied). The eligible proposals received by the deadline are as follows:

 

RFP/Q Title & No.

Target
Allocation

No. of Eligible
Proposals
Received by
Deadline

Total $
Requests

Alternative Fuel Transit Bus RFP #P2001-09

$4,250,000

10

$12,821,642

On-Road/Off-Road Heavy-Duty Diesel Pollution Reduction RFP #P2001-08

$3,250,000

23

$11,981,833

Regional Electric-Assist Bicycle Incentive RFQ #Q2001-02

$100,000

  4

$325,000

Voluntary Employer-Based Rideshare Incentive RFP #P2001-04

$300,000

  3

$654,755

Information Technology/ATMIS Trip Reduction Strategies RFP #P2001-05

$300,000

  2

$275,000

Employer-Based Bicycle Projects RFP #P2001-06

$100,000

  3

$93,202

Transit-Oriented Development Land-Use Strategies RFP #P2001-07

$200,000

  1

$120,000

Total

$8,500,000

46

$26,271,432

Per the MSRC's adopted Guidelines for AB 2766 Discretionary Fund Proposal Submission and Evaluation Process, the MSRC's Technical Advisory Committee (MSRC-TAC) formed several evaluation subcommittees to review, evaluate, score and rank the proposals, using the criteria within each solicitation. Based upon the results of the evaluation, the MSRC-TAC developed its funding recommendations in the form of two lists per category. The first list includes all projects deemed to be worthy of funding and the second list includes all projects not recommended for funding under any circumstance.

Panel Composition

The evaluation subcommittees for the MSRC-TAC included the following:

Transit Bus Evaluation Subcommittee: Chair Ken Koyama, representing CEC; Sylvia Oey, representing ARB; Marilyn Williams, representing RCTC; and George Karbowski, representing LACMTA.

Heavy-Duty Evaluation Subcommittee: Chair Doug Kim, representing LACMTA; Sylvia Oey, representing ARB; Diana Kotler, representing Orange County Cities; Gretchen Hardison, representing City of Los Angeles; and Ken Koyama, representing CEC.

Bicycles Evaluation Subcommittee: Chair Cheryl Collier, representing SCR; Gretchen Hardison, representing City of Los Angeles; Melinda Bowman, representing Orange County Board of Supervisors; and Vince Mastrosimone, representing Los Angeles County Cities.

Rideshare/ATMIS Evaluation Subcommittee: Chair Greg Neal, representing Riverside County Board of Supervisors; Antonio Thomas, representing the SCAQMD; and Michelle Kirkhoff, representing SANBAG.

Land-Use Evaluation Subcommittee: Chair Marilyn Williams, representing RCTC; Dave Cowardin, representing Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors; Greg Neal, representing Riverside County Board of Supervisors; Bob Huddy, representing SCR; and Dave Ashuckian, representing CEC.

Proposal

At its November 30, 2000 meeting, the MSRC considered recommendations from its Technical Advisory Committee on the projects proposed for funding under this Work Program.

Because of the demand in the heavy-duty and transit categories and the MSRC's desire to fund more projects in these categories, the MSRC took several actions to make available additional funds. First, they recognized uncommitted monies totaling $2,276,563 in turnback funds and interest. Second, they deobligated $500,000 that it had set aside four years ago for a potential vehicle scrapping program in conjunction with the ARB, with the caveat that the next work program would consider scrapping as a priority. Third, they released $1 million originally reserved in this Work Program for the CNG school bus buydown program in light of the $50 million state program being administered by the ARB (the MSRC's existing CNG school bus buydown program continues through June 30, 2001, and has $948,000 in available funding remaining). Finally, the MSRC released $400,883 in monies not being recommended for funding under the TCM categories.

These actions provided an additional $4,177,446 to fund additional projects within the heavy-duty and transit categories. In an effort to support the AQMD's fleet rules, the MSRC decided the following:

  1. to allocate an additional $2,914,164 (above and beyond the $4.25 million originally targeted) to the transit category, thus ensuring that all smaller transit operators and first-time transit applicants could be funded; and

  2. to allocate an additional $1,263,282 (above and beyond the $3.25 million originally targeted) to the heavy-duty category, thus ensuring that all public fleet projects were funded as well as a portion of two more private fleet projects.

In summary, the MSRC unanimously approved the following as part of its FY 2000-01 Work Program, further details on which are provided in the attachments:

 

Category

No. of Projects
Recommended
for Funding

Total
Funding

Alternative Fuel Transit Bus Program

  8

$7,164,164

On-Road/Off-Road Heavy-Duty Diesel Pollution Reduction Program

13

$4,513,282

Regional Electric-Assist Bicycle Incentive Program

  4
(vendors)

$100,000

Voluntary Employer-Based Rideshare Program

  1

$300,000

Information Technology/ATMIS Program

  0

$0

Employer-Based Bicycle Projects

  2

$79,117

Transit-Oriented Development Land-Use Strategies

  1

$120,000

Total

29

12,276,563

In addition to the above $12,276,563, the MSRC's FY 2000-01 Work Program includes $2 million to continue implementation of its light-duty buydown incentives for ZEVs and ULEVs. However, because there is currently very low ZEV product availability, and because ULEV demand is high, the MSRC has allocated the $2 million to the ULEV buydown. To clarify the intent of its action, the MSRC adopted a resolution reaffirming its commitment to supporting the region's ZEV program (there remain some monies available from a prior work program allocation for ZEV buydown in case product becomes available).

Finally, the FY 2000-01 Work Program includes $3 million for its Alternative Fuels Subvention Fund Match Program, the program announcement and application for which was released in September 2000. Applications will be accepted under this program from February 1, 2001, through June 30, 2001. Recommendations on specific projects under the Match Program will be submitted monthly to the Governing Board as they are received as part of the FY 2000-01 Work Program.

This action is to request approval of the FY 2000-01 Work Program, as described in this Board letter and the attachments, as follows: a) an allocation of $12,276,563 to fund 29 transit bus, heavy-duty vehicle, and TCM projects; b) continuing an allocation of $2 million to the light-duty buydown incentives for a $3,000 incentive towards certified ULEVs; and c) continuing an allocation of $3 million for the Alternative Fuels Subvention Fund Match Program, with specific projects funded under this program to be approved by the Board at a later date. This results in a FY 2000-01 Work Program totaling approximately $17.2 million.

In some cases the full amount requested by a proposer is not recommended for funding or the proposed scope of work has been modified. This is consistent with the MSRC's administrative policies, which allow the MSRC the right to approve a portion of the proposers' scope of work and/or funding request. In those cases where the proposed funding level or scope of work has been modified by the MSRC, and the proposer cannot perform the project as recommended, the MSRC requests the authority to rescind the funding commitment for that proposer and retain the funds in the Discretionary Fund account for future work programs.

The MSRC also requests authority to adjust the funds allocated to each project by up to 5% of a project's recommended funding as specified in the attachments. The Board has granted this authority to the MSRC for all past work programs.

Finally, the MSRC requests that the Board authorize the AQMD Board Chairman the authority to execute agreements with the proposers set forth in this Board letter and the attachments for the FY 2000-01 Work Program.

Resource Impacts

The AQMD acts as fiscal administrator for the AB 2766 Discretionary Fund Program (Health & Safety Code Section 44243). Money received for this program is recorded in a special revenue fund (Fund 23), and the contracts will be drawn from this fund. These contracts will have no fiscal impact on the AQMD’s operational budget.

Attachments

-Individual Funding Spreadsheets for Each Category
-Individual Summary Sheets for TCM Projects

/ / /