AQMD logo graphic South Coast Air Quality Management District



BOARD MEETING DATE: November 9, 2001 AGENDA NO. 10




PROPOSAL: 

Execute Contract for Investment Consultant Services

SYNOPSIS: 

This action is to award a contract in the sum of $40,983 to Sperry Capital Inc. to provide investment consultant services to assist in the annual update of AQMD’s Investment Policy and Guidelines, advise staff on short-term investment strategies and to provide investment monitoring and compliance reporting services.

COMMITTEE: 

Investment Oversight, November 2, 2001

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Award bid to and authorize the Chairman to execute a contract with Sperry Capital Inc. for Investment Consultant Services at a cost of $13,200 for FY 2001-02, $13,660 for FY 2002-03 and $14,123 for FY 2003-04.

Barry R. Wallerstein, D.Env.
Executive Officer


Background

The Board, based on extensive reviews in 1996 and 2000 of the AQMD treasury management operations and the risk and benefits associated with investing in a commingled county investment pool, has directed staff to work with the County to reallocate a significant portion of its short-term investments from the County’s commingled Pooled Surplus Investment Portfolio into its noncommingled Special Purpose Investment Portfolio and into the Local Agency Investment Fund managed by the State Treasurer. To implement this change in investment policy, staff utilizes the services of an investment consultant to assist in the annual update of the AQMD Investment Policy and Guidelines; advise staff on short-term investment strategies available to the AQMD through its Treasurer, the County of Los Angeles; and provide investment monitoring and reporting services to the AQMD to ensure compliance with its investment policies. An RFP for Investment Consultant services was issued on September 22, 2001. These services are for a period of three years.

Outreach

In accordance with the AQMD’s consulting and contracting policies, a public notice advertising the RFP and inviting bids was published in the following publications:
 

1.

Antelope Valley Press

12.

La Prensa Hispana

23.

Rafu Shimpo

2.

Black Voice News

13.

La Voz

24.

Press Enterprise

3.

Chinese Daily News

14.

Los Angeles Daily News

25.

San Bernardino Sun

4.

Eastern Group Publications

15.

Los Angeles Sentinel

26.

Santa Clarita Sisgnal

5.

El Chicano

16.

Los Angeles Times

27.

State of California Contract

6.

El Informador

17.

M/W/DVBE Source

28.

Register

7.

Excelsior, The

18.

Orange County Register

29.

Wave Publications

8.

Inland Empire Hispanic News

19.

Palm Springs Desert Sun

30.

State of California Contracts

9.

Inland Valley Daily Bulletin

20.

Orange County Register

31.

Register

10.

Korea Central Daily

21.

Philippine News

   

11.

La Opinion

22.

Precinct Reporter

   

Additionally, potential bidders were identified using AQMD and other agency listings of vendors licensed and specializing in investment/financial consultant services. Notices of the RFP were mailed to the Black and Latino Legislative Caucuses and various minority chambers of commerce and business associations; and placed on the Internet at AQMD’s Web site [http://www.aqmd.gov "Business and Job Opportunities" icon] and AQMD’s 24-hour telephone message line for bidders (909) 396-2724.

Proposal

A total of thirty-six (36) copies of the RFP were mailed out. Two bids and two no bids were received in response to the RFP when final bidding closed at 5:00 p.m. on October 19, 2001. The proposals were reviewed by a panel composed of the Manager of Treasury/Public Finance for the Orange County Transportation Authority, an Accounting Officer, from the Treasurer/Tax Collector, County of Los Angeles, and the Chief Financial Officer and the Controller from the AQMD. The panel consisted of two females and two males; two Asian/Pacific Islander, one Caucasian, and one Hispanic.

The evaluation results for the bidders are:

BIDDER

TECHNICAL
SCORE

COST
SCORE

ADDITIONAL
POINTS

TOTAL
POINTS

BID
AMOUNT

OVERALL
RANK

Sperry Capital, Inc.

61.7

30

 10 *

101.7

  $40,983

1

Public Financial Management

58.5

10

0

  68.5

$128,050

2

* Small Business points

The selection criteria used to rank the proposals included: understanding the work to be performed, technical/management approach; contractor qualifications; previous experience; cost; and Small Business, DVBE, local business designation. While both responsive firms were well qualified to perform the required services, the panel selected the top-scoring firm of Sperry Capital Inc. to be recommended to the Board.

Resource Impacts

The total costs, including out-of-pocket expenses, are $13,200, $13,660, and $14,123 for FYs 2001-02, 2002-03, 2003-04, respectively. This represents a maximum cost for the three-year period of $40,983. Sufficient funds for the first year of the contract are included in the FY 2001-02 Budget and will be budgeted for the second and third years.

/ / /