BOARD MEETING DATE: November 9, 2001 AGENDA NO. 10
Execute Contract for Investment Consultant Services
SYNOPSIS:
This action is to award a contract in the sum of $40,983 to Sperry Capital Inc. to provide investment consultant services to assist in the annual update of AQMDs Investment Policy and Guidelines, advise staff on short-term investment strategies and to provide investment monitoring and compliance reporting services.
COMMITTEE:
Investment Oversight, November 2, 2001
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Award bid to and authorize the Chairman to execute a contract with Sperry Capital Inc. for Investment Consultant Services at a cost of $13,200 for FY 2001-02, $13,660 for FY 2002-03 and $14,123 for FY 2003-04.
Barry R. Wallerstein, D.Env.
Executive Officer
Background
The Board, based on extensive reviews in 1996 and 2000 of the AQMD treasury management operations and the risk and benefits associated with investing in a commingled county investment pool, has directed staff to work with the County to reallocate a significant portion of its short-term investments from the County’s commingled Pooled Surplus Investment Portfolio into its noncommingled Special Purpose Investment Portfolio and into the Local Agency Investment Fund managed by the State Treasurer. To implement this change in investment policy, staff utilizes the services of an investment consultant to assist in the annual update of the AQMD Investment Policy and Guidelines; advise staff on short-term investment strategies available to the AQMD through its Treasurer, the County of Los Angeles; and provide investment monitoring and reporting services to the AQMD to ensure compliance with its investment policies. An RFP for Investment Consultant services was issued on September 22, 2001. These services are for a period of three years.
Outreach
In accordance with the AQMD’s consulting and contracting policies, a public
notice advertising the RFP and inviting bids was published in the following
publications:
|
1. |
Antelope Valley Press |
12. |
La Prensa Hispana |
23. |
Rafu Shimpo |
|
2. |
Black Voice News |
13. |
La Voz |
24. |
Press Enterprise |
|
3. |
Chinese Daily News |
14. |
Los Angeles Daily News |
25. |
San Bernardino Sun |
|
4. |
Eastern Group Publications |
15. |
Los Angeles Sentinel |
26. |
Santa Clarita Sisgnal |
|
5. |
El Chicano |
16. |
Los Angeles Times |
27. |
State of California Contract |
|
6. |
El Informador |
17. |
M/W/DVBE Source |
28. |
Register |
|
7. |
Excelsior, The |
18. |
Orange County Register |
29. |
Wave Publications |
|
8. |
Inland Empire Hispanic News |
19. |
Palm Springs Desert Sun |
30. |
State of California Contracts |
|
9. |
Inland Valley Daily Bulletin |
20. |
Orange County Register |
31. |
Register |
|
10. |
Korea Central Daily |
21. |
Philippine News | ||
|
11. |
La Opinion |
22. |
Precinct Reporter |
Additionally, potential bidders were identified using AQMD and other agency listings of vendors licensed and specializing in investment/financial consultant services. Notices of the RFP were mailed to the Black and Latino Legislative Caucuses and various minority chambers of commerce and business associations; and placed on the Internet at AQMDs Web site [http://www.aqmd.gov "Business and Job Opportunities" icon] and AQMDs 24-hour telephone message line for bidders (909) 396-2724.
Proposal
A total of thirty-six (36) copies of the RFP were mailed out. Two bids and two no bids were received in response to the RFP when final bidding closed at 5:00 p.m. on October 19, 2001. The proposals were reviewed by a panel composed of the Manager of Treasury/Public Finance for the Orange County Transportation Authority, an Accounting Officer, from the Treasurer/Tax Collector, County of Los Angeles, and the Chief Financial Officer and the Controller from the AQMD. The panel consisted of two females and two males; two Asian/Pacific Islander, one Caucasian, and one Hispanic.
The evaluation results for the bidders are:
|
BIDDER |
TECHNICAL |
COST |
ADDITIONAL |
TOTAL |
BID |
OVERALL |
|
Sperry Capital, Inc. |
61.7 |
30 |
10 * |
101.7 |
$40,983 |
1 |
|
Public Financial Management |
58.5 |
10 |
0 |
68.5 |
$128,050 |
2 |
* Small Business points
The selection criteria used to rank the proposals included: understanding the work to be performed, technical/management approach; contractor qualifications; previous experience; cost; and Small Business, DVBE, local business designation. While both responsive firms were well qualified to perform the required services, the panel selected the top-scoring firm of Sperry Capital Inc. to be recommended to the Board.
Resource Impacts
The total costs, including out-of-pocket expenses, are $13,200, $13,660, and $14,123 for FYs 2001-02, 2002-03, 2003-04, respectively. This represents a maximum cost for the three-year period of $40,983. Sufficient funds for the first year of the contract are included in the FY 2001-02 Budget and will be budgeted for the second and third years.
/ / /