![]() |
BOARD MEETING DATE: April 5, 2002
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
REPORT:
SYNOPSIS:
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Norma J. Glover, Chairman Attendance: Present were Chairman Norma Glover, Member Beatrice LaPisto-Kirtley, and Member Roy Wilson (via videoteleconference). Absent were Member William Burke and Vice Chairman Hal Bernson. DISCUSSION ITEMS:
APRIL AGENDA ITEMS:
Meeting adjourned at 10:12 a.m. Attachments
ETHNIC COMMUNITY ADVISORY GROUP ECAG CHAIRPERSON
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| AFRICAN-AMERICAN CAUCUS PRESENT: |
ABSENT: |
| Stan Lee | John Harris |
| Tod Short | Edgar Perez |
| Leslie Spencer | Mike Stevens |
| LATINO CAUCUS | |
| Paul Avila | Harold Martinez |
| Fernando Del Rio | |
| Rose Montoya-Lona | |
| Anastacio Medina | |
| Ericka Smith |
| ASIAN-PACIFIC ISLANDER CAUCUS | |
| Thomas Chang | Stephen Sheng |
| Paul Choe | |
| Jason Do | |
| Satoshi Nitta | |
| OTHERS PRESENT: Ryan Peralta |
|
| Rhonda Reyes | (Board Assistant to Governing Board Member Verdugo-Peralta) |
| Consultants: | From RCA, Anthony Samada |
| From Strategy Workshop, Ken Chan and Christine Conlan | |
| From Oralia Michel, Oralia Michel, George Pla, and Rosalie Calderon | |
| From Imada Wong, Nita Song and Jimmie Lee | |
| DISTRICT STAFF: Marilyn F. Solomon, DEO/Public Affairs & Transportation Programs |
| Gloria White-Brown, Sr. Deputy District Counsel |
| Lourdes C. Martinez, Community Outreach Manager |
| Larry Kolczak, Community Outreach Manager |
| Lisha Smith, Sr. Public Information Specialist |
| Sue Milliken, Sr. Administrative Secretary |
Agenda Item #1 – Call to Order/Opening Remarks
Governing Board Member Cynthia Verdugo-Peralta called the meeting to
order at 1:10 p.m. There was a quorum. The consultants who will be working
on ethnic community outreach introduced themselves. They were invited to
listen to the committee’s suggestions on outreach to affected communities.
Agenda Item #2 – Approval of November 14, 2001, Minutes
Board Member Verdugo-Peralta indicated that she had discussed last
month’s minutes with the Executive Officer and it was agreed that future
minutes would consist of summaries of discussions rather than almost
verbatim minutes. Anastacio Medina indicated two typos on page 8 that he
would like corrected: changing "dust cover" to "dust color" and "duct" to
"dust." With those changes noted, the minutes were approved without
opposition.
Agenda Item #3 - Year 2002 Goals & Objectives
Board Member Verdugo-Peralta reviewed the goals and objectives that
were discussed at the last meeting:
Agenda Item #4 - Ethnic Community Outreach Update
Marilyn F. Solomon gave a brief summary of AQMD’s efforts to reach
out to more than just the regulated communities by looking at the
unregulated public, particularly with the overlay of environmental justice.
Staff has been looking at how to apply this internally by using a strategy
developed about 30 years ago called social marketing: Taking commercial
marketing practices and techniques and applying them to the social arena.
Ms. Solomon indicated that we are going to be using social marketing to
bring the unregulated public into a partnership with AQMD and other air
quality agencies to improve air quality. We cannot do it alone. We cannot do
it solely through regulation. We need to do it by modifying human behavior.
Staff is working with four consultant groups to work on ethnic outreach
activities with AQMD’s Public Affairs staff. On January 23, 2002,
consultants and AQMD staff will spend a full day at AQMD developing
strategies, including ECAG’s input today, and putting them into a specific
plan so that we are clear about who’s doing what. We expect overlap but we
don’t want redundancy.
Anastacio Medina outlined the following areas to take into consideration as AQMD plans its enhanced outreach program:
Rose Montoya-Lona said that AQMD should use local elected officials to inform their constituents about air quality issues. She also said that AQMD should think about making children the focus as often as possible since people are more often moved to action when their children’s safety is an issue.
AQMD Board Member Verdugo-Peralta mentioned that, on a positive note, when AQMD partners with different community health agencies for events like health fairs, it affords us an opportunity to get our message out in a positive atmosphere.
Lourdes C. Martinez explained that it is important to realize that we need the general population to help us if we are going to reach our clean air goals. It’s important for the population of this Basin to understand that industry has done so much, and it’s the most regulated of any facilities in the world, but you can only do so much with regulation and then it’s up to the people. People need to be concerned about their children’s health, their health, their parent’s health, and the next generation’s health. What are they willing to do to help us? We’ve made tremendous progress from the 1970s to now, but we still have the worst air pollution. She said when people ask, "What do you want me to do?" we need to be able to tell them.
Mr. Medina noted that ECAG should become more familiar with Environmental Justice, especially as its been adopted by both the AQMD and the California Air Resources Board. What is the best way to deliver the EJ message? Mr. Medina also recommended the development of a report card, a concept developed by the Los Angeles Unified School District’s Oversight Committee. The report card tells the public what is being accomplished with facts and assures that the programs are going in the right direction (Ms. Solomon said that is being built into the Task Orders we are currently developing, but the concept does need to be adopted District-wide.)
Some committee members wanted more time to come up with ideas. Ms. Solomon indicated that what they would like today are issues or concerns in their communities that we need to address as we go through the process. She added that it is a two-year process and staff will bring back to the Committee again for more input. Board Member Verdugo-Peralta suggested putting this issue on the agenda every month.
Ms. Solomon asked if it would be helpful to the committee if we got MATES II information out to the committee prior to the next meeting. The committee would like to have that information. She also agreed to have AQMD’s Environmental Justice Coordinator come to the next ECAG meeting and give an overview of AQMD’s Environmental Justice Program.
The consultants were invited to give a brief overview of their qualifications. Ms. Solomon reiterated that Wednesday, January 23, has been set aside for a planning meeting with AQMD staff and the four consultants. The ECAG caucus chairs are invited to attend, as well. It will be an all-day meeting here at AQMD. Continental breakfast and lunch will be provided. Dr. Alex Norman from UCLA, who is a specialist in group facilitation, has agreed to be the facilitator. At the end of that day we hope to lay out a very rich, full detailed plan with roles of responsibilities clear for everyone.
Agenda Item #5 – Environmental Justice Conference
Update
Ms. Martinez reported that on December 7 & 8 AQMD was a co-sponsor
of an environmental justice conference that was held at the First Church of
God in Inglewood and hosted by USC and UCLA. There were about 300 people in
attendance. It was called, "Voices for Healthy Environment, Healthy
Communities, and Healthy Jobs." Ms. Martinez reported that overall it was a
great program. It brought together environmental justice leaders from
various communities, organizations, government, the public, and health-based
researchers to talk about where we are going with regard to environmental
justice, and what are some of the programs and problems that we still need
to address. Ms. Solomon was one of the panelists on the first session and
reported an interesting exchange with unhappy audience members. Ms. Solomon
indicated that we think we’ve really done some very positive things on
environmental justice, and it was kind of startling to see people who are
still very upset with us with regard to many of our programs and policies.
It is obvious that we still have a long way to go to get people to feel as
though they are part of the team. There is still a lot of us-versus-them
mentality. Ms. Solomon and Ms. Martinez met the Director of the National
Institute of Environmental Health Services out of Washington, DC, who is
very excited about AQMD and its environmental justice program, and is very
interested in seeing how we may be able to work together in the future on EJ
programs.
Ms. Martinez invited Committee members to suggest locations for Town Hall Meetings. Typically they are held in communities where there are problems or that we haven’t been to. Committee members were encouraged to let us know of any community that would like to invite us over and would like to host a Town Hall Meeting. We need about six weeks to plan a meeting, so we are already putting together our calendar for next year throughout the four counties. Prior to the meeting we identify any air quality problems in that community and neighboring communities so we’re prepared for the issues that are going to be coming up. We give a brief presentation on who we are, what we do, what’s the air quality in that community, and then we open it up to questions. Our Executive Officer and his management team attend all of the meetings. If an issue comes up that is not part of our process, we identify which agency is the appropriate agency and we make the connection for them.
Agenda Item #6 – Year 2002 Proposed Meeting Schedule
It was agreed that the second Wednesday of each month is still good
for the majority of committee members.
Agenda Item #7 – Children’s Air Quality Agenda Subcommittee
Ms. Montoya-Lona reported that the Children’s Air Quality Agenda Subcommittee is temporarily on hold. She mentioned the Children’s Future Cities competition is January 19. ECAG should be there to issue an award to the winner of the Southern California competition, which will be a school from Orange, Los Angeles, San Bernardino, or San Diego Counties. They have to address environmental and air quality issues. The winner goes on to Washington D.C. for the national championships. AQMD is a co-sponsor for this event. Last year ECAG presented a separate award.
Agenda Item #8 – Ethnic Media Outreach
No further discussion.
Agenda Item #9 – Discussion on Energy Issues
Board Member Verdugo-Peralta reminded everyone that Edison had what
is called a "blitz," where they go out and do energy surveys for small
businesses in a short amount of time. It was supposed to end December 31
with any applications for rebates having a drop-dead date of the 14th.
She reported that they’re tentatively going to extend that through March 31,
2002. If you still are looking at installing an air conditioner, lighting
(commercial or residential), replacement windows, thermostats, anything
energy-related that’s on the rebate list, please call the 800 number and
reserve your money for that measure. The audit program may go through 2002.
Agenda Item #10 – Discussion on Governing Board Agenda
Items
No discussion.
Agenda Item #11 – Other Business
A question was raised about ECAG’s ability to hold a hearing, where
people come and tell us what is on their mind. Gloria White-Brown explained
that ECAG has no authority to hold hearings but they can receive public
comment. Anyone can come and speak at an ECAG meeting, on any item on the
agenda or even under Other Business. Under the Brown Act, ECAG meetings can
be held at other locations as long as it is within the four counties and it
has to be properly noticed, and it would most likely be considered a special
meeting (which requires 24 hour notice, not 72 hours), but it can be done.
Someone asked what the procedure is for potential members to ECAG. Board Member Verdugo-Peralta explained that it’s specified in a letter to Dr. Burke dated September 28, 2001which outlined ECAG’s revised organizational strategy. Prospective new members must first submit a letter of interest, with a resume, to ECAG Chair Verdugo-Peralta either directly or through AQMD staff.
Public Comment
No discussion.
Adjournment
The meeting was adjourned at 2:47 p.m.
ETHNIC COMMUNITY ADVISORY GROUP
WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 9, 2002
MEETING MINUTES
| AFRICAN-AMERICAN CAUCUS | |
| PRESENT: | ABSENT: |
| Stan Lee — Chair | Tod Short |
| Leslie Spencer | Mike Stevens |
| John Harris — Co-chair | |
| Edgar Perez | |
| LATINO CAUCUS | |
| Paul Avila | Anastacio Medina |
| Fernando Del Rio — Co-chair | Ericka Smith — Chair |
| Rose Montoya-Lona | |
| Harold Martinez | |
| ASIAN-PACIFIC ISLANDER CAUCUS | |
| Thomas Chang — Chair | Paul Choe |
| Stephen Sheng — Co-Chair | |
| Jason Do | |
| Satoshi Nitta | |
| ECAG CHAIRPERSON | |
| Board Member Cynthia Verdugo-Peralta | |
| OTHERS PRESENT: | |
| Rhonda Reyes, Board Assistant (Verdugo-Peralta) | |
| AQMD STAFF: | |
| Oscar Abarca, Assistant DEO/Public Affairs & Transportation Programs | |
| Gloria White-Brown, Sr. Deputy District Counsel | |
| Lourdes C. Martinez, Community Outreach Manager | |
| Natalia Porche, AQMD Staff | |
| Lisha Smith, Sr. Public Information Specialist | |
| Aurora Schneider, Secretary |
Agenda Item #1 – Call to Order/Opening Remarks
Board Member and ECAG Chairperson, Cynthia Verdugo-Peralta, was not
present for this meeting. Asian-Pacific Islander Caucus Chair, Tom Chang,
presided over the meeting. It was called to order at 1:15 p.m. There was a
quorum.
Agenda Item #2 – Approval of December 18, 2001, Minutes and
Follow-Up Action Items
Harold Martinez stated that he was not in attendance at the meeting
and that his name should be removed as being present. Thomas Chang’s name
was misspelled in the minutes. The minutes were approved with the
corrections noted above.
Lourdes Cordova Martinez discussed the summary of follow-up/action items (copy attached to agenda).
Oscar Abarca reported on a day-long retreat scheduled for January 23, 2002, for AQMD staff involved in outreach, including the four consultants selected to help with community outreach program. The meeting will be facilitated by Dr. Alex Norman. The chairs of the caucuses were invited to attend the meeting. From this meeting, a number of task orders will be developed for the consultants to assist with AQMD’s enhanced community outreach efforts.
Stan Lee announced that the new leadership for the African-American Caucus would be himself as Chairman and John Harris as Co-chair.
Agenda Item #3 – Approval of Caucus Member Renewal
Stan Lee stated that the African-American caucus has selected Mike
Robbins for renewal to their caucus. Thomas Chang stated that the
Asian-Pacific Islander caucus would be reporting back with a recommendation
for a new member next month.
Agenda Item #4 – Environmental Justice Program Overview
A presentation on Environmental Justice (EJ) was given by AQMD
Environmental Justice Coordinator Natalia Porche. The AQMD’s Governing Board
adopted EJ principles and ten initiatives in October of 1997. As of March
2000, all the initiatives have been completed or adopted with the exception
of the town hall meetings and community response teams, which are ongoing
items. Ms. Porche said that part of EJ is educating the public about AQMD,
and indicated that EJ activities are included in the monthly Governing Board
report in the Public Affairs Report.
The agency co-sponsors and participates in area and regional EJ meetings. Six town hall meetings are scheduled for the first half of the year. AQMD is offering assistance to other agencies in the development of their EJ strategies.
On February 6, AQMD, USEPA, and the Governor's Office of Planning & Research will be hosting an EJ training class for representatives from community-based organizations, other agencies, and businesses to come together to discuss EJ. One topic to be discussed is "How to identify an EJ case, and what are the impacts."
AQMD will be participating in an upcoming town hall meeting with the Center for Community Action and Environmental Justice in Mira Loma in February. AQMD attended a similar meeting last year and presented data from PM10 and dust studies.
A question arose on how town hall meeting locations are determined. Ms. Porche said that town hall meetings are determined by a number of factors including, but not limited to, the number of complaints that are received on AQMD’s toll-free line, requests from local elected officials, and through information received from AQMD inspectors. Currently, the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach are generating a lot of interest. AQMD is also planning to host a meeting in the Coachella Valley in the spring, which is the height of their dust season.
Agenda Item #5 – Year 2002 Goals & Objectives
After a brief discussion, ECAG members decided that they would like
to see the goals and objectives that were submitted last year so they can
update them rather than start this year with a complete new set of goals.
Ms. Martinez will provide a copy of the goals from the prior year. Ms.
Martinez reminded the committee members that Board Member Verdugo-Peralta
requested that the group think about having an event per quarter to get
ECAG’s message out to the public in each county. Ms. Martinez also mentioned
that if the committee would like to have a breakfast meeting with Governing
Board members, she would discuss this item with Board Member Verdugo-Peralta
for a future meeting date.
On motion from Stan Lee and seconded by Leslie Spencer, this item will be continued to the February meeting for further discussion and action.
Agenda Item #6 – Children’s Air Quality Agenda Subcommittee
No discussion on Children’s Air Quality was given.
Mr. Chang stated that ECAG currently has several subcommittees and suggested that the subcommittees be revisited and reorganized, if needed, and that this item be placed on the February agenda.
Agenda Item #7 – Ethnic Media Outreach
Ms. Montoya-Lona reported that the Future Cities competition is on
January 19, 2002. ECAG will be presenting an award to the winner of the
Southern California competition. Mr. Lee will check on his availability to
present this award.
Agenda Item #8 – Discussion on Energy Issues
Ms. Martinez reported that the California Energy Commission has
requested that AQMD assist them in hosting a community meeting to inform the
public about Sunlaw’s proposed expansion of their facility in the City of
Vernon.
Agenda Item #9 – Enhanced Outreach Program Update
No discussion.
Agenda Item #10 – Discussion on Governing Board Agenda Items
A summary of the action items for the February Board meeting was
attached to the agenda. Ms. Martinez mentioned that the following items were
of interest to ECAG members: 1) Rule 1421 Control of Perc Emission from Dry
Cleaning — a set hearing will be made for action by the Board in March; 2)
status report on controlling VOCs and ammonia emissions from composting
operations; 3) approval of staff proposal to proceed with developing
localized significance thresholds to be incorporated into the Air Quality
Analysis Guidance Handbook; and 4) adoption of Proposed Rule 1137 PM10
Emissions from woodworking operations. In the past several months'
presentations on these items were given at ECAG meetings.
Agenda Item #11 – Other Business
Mr. Lee suggested that business cards be issued to ECAG members to
be handed out when ECAG members are out at events. He suggested that the
business cards contain AQMD’s toll-free number and that on the back of the
card the ECAG mission statement be listed.
Gloria White-Brown, Sr. Deputy District Counsel, stated that this issue will be discussed with AQMD’s management. Ms. White-Brown suggested that this be brought to the attention of Board Member Verdugo-Peralta for review and discussion.
Ms. Montoya-Lona mentioned that she had a friend who writes editorials for the business section of the Daily Breeze and requested that staff forward any news items to her to forward to the reporter. Mr. Lee mentioned that he, too, has a friend that hosts a public access cable program in Los Angeles. Possibly we could get space and time on her program. Leslie Spencer suggested that these items be brought to the Media Outreach Subcommittee.
Public Comment
No public comments.
Adjournment
The meeting was adjourned at 2:45 pm.
LOCAL GOVERNMENT & SMALL BUSINESS
ASSISTANCE ADVISORY GROUP
FRIDAY, JANUARY 4, 2002
MEETING MINUTES
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Ronald Loveridge, AQMD Board Member
Cynthia Verdugo-Peralta, AQMD Board Member
Greg Adams, Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts
Detrich Allen, City of Los Angeles
Gene Beck, EnviroTech Financial
Arthur Brown, Orange County Council of Governments (OCCOG)
Margaret Clark, City of Rosemead
Jeff Comerchero, Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC)
Gary Stafford, Terra Furniture
John DeWitt, California Industries Oil Marketers Association
MEMBERS ABSENT:
(Chairman) Norma Glover, AQMD Board Member
Terry Lacko, Monarch Industries
Dale Silverman, Association of Woodworking & Furnishing Suppliers
OTHERS PRESENT:
John Billheimer, Enviro-Reality
Bill LaMarr, California Small Business Alliance
Vlad Kogan, OCSD
Dominic Meo, Meo & Associates
Lara Saunders, Board Assistant to Chairman Glover
Jeb Stuart, CIAQC
AQMD STAFF:
Marilyn F. Solomon, Deputy Executive Officer, Public Affairs &
Transportation
Barbara Baird, District Counsel
Gloria White-Brown, Senior Deputy District Counsel
Larry Kolczak, Manager
Julia Lester, P.h.D., Program Supervisor
Steve Smith, Ph.D., Program Supervisor
Scott Dawson, Air Quality Specialist
Christine Wilder, Public Information Specialist
Sue Milliken, Senior Administrative Secretary
Agenda Item #1 – Call to Order/Opening Remarks
Governing Board Member Ronald Loveridge called the meeting to order
at 9:38 a.m.
Agenda Item #2 – Approval of November 2, 2001 Meeting Minutes
The minutes were approved with the following changes: Mr. John
DeWitt was shown as not attending (he did attend the meeting); Item #4
misspelled acronyms to be corrected and include contact number.
Agenda Item #6 – Status Report on Rule 1137
This item was taken out of order. Dr. Julia Lester gave a presentation to the group. Copies of the presentation, draft staff report, and draft socioeconomic report were available at the meeting. The presentation focused on staff’s rationale for proceeding with the rule. There was a two-fold reason. The first was that this rule is necessary to take credit for industry’s current PM10 reductions in our State Implementation Plan (SIP). This allows the removal of the Control Measure PRC-01, which has been on the books for over 10 years, and removes it as a target of control for future air quality plans. Second, state and federal laws call for the region to expeditiously adopt all feasible measures. Staff believes that Proposed Rule 1137 meets these requirements with the least impact on an industry that has already implemented PM10 controls. Proposed Rule 1137 was developed with comments from industry and the public through a series of meetings. Staff estimates there are approximately 500 of these facilities with pneumatic conveyance systems that would be regulated by the rule.
The latest proposed changes are a one-time filing in July of this year, some improved housekeeping for waste transfer and disposal, and removing the requirement that waste disposal bins would have to be replaced. As long as any visible emissions are not going over the property line, they can continue to do waste transfer on their facilities. For new and expanded facilities starting in July, there will be the one-time filing and baghouse control system with the no visible emissions requirement. For small facilities it could be something as simple as a high-efficiency cyclone with after filters. For large facilities it could be a full baghouse system. Staff estimates that just a few facilities would require upgrading, either with better shrouding or changing from low-efficiency to high-efficiency cyclones or high-efficiency cyclones with baghouse.
In response to public comments, the implementation date for those existing facilities was moved from July 2002 to January 2004 to allow additional time for facility assessments and potential modifications. Emission reductions are very small, about one-tenth of a ton per day. The cost effectiveness is correspondingly high because of small emission reductions. In the draft socioeconomic report, the annualized industry cost is conservatively estimated at about $180,000. Numerous meetings with the industry and focus groups were held in the beginning of last year. There was a public workshop in September. A public consultation meeting is scheduled for next Tuesday, January 8, 2002 at 11:00 a.m. in the auditorium to go over the changes made to the rule and to receive comments before the January 11, 2002 set hearing on this rule (Board hearing on February 1, 2002).
Mr. Gary Stafford expressed concern that no visible emissions during disposal is an impossibility for woodworking facilities. He said the rule is based on the number of employees and that instead it should be based on the amount of emissions. He was concerned about the no visible emissions during windy conditions and Texas rules. He also discussed the possible loss of manufacturing facilities and the impact on the minority community.
Board Member Cynthia Verdugo-Peralta did not see a matrix that compared the different types of companies. Her family has been involved with the lumber industry for the past three generations, and her husband is in the woodworking business. She would like to see the difference between the types of emissions instead of the number of employees. Additionally, she wanted to know if there was going to be a socioeconomic report presentation to the Board members.
Mr. Greg Adams had a concern on why AQMD is going after cellulose-based particulate versus the kind of particulate that EPA is ordinarily interested in: nitrate- or sulfate-based materials.
Dr. Lester explained that, unlike ozone and carbon monoxide where it is set by a specific chemical compound, PM10 is set basically by size. The health effects have not been differentiated for the different components. EPA moved in that direction coming up with the PM2.5 standard, but they retained the PM10 standard.
Margaret Clark expressed her concern that the emission reductions indicated in the 1997 AQMP showed the estimated emission reduction to be much greater than the current level of less than 1 ton and questioned whether AQMD should adopt a rule that would result in such minor emission reductions. Several members also expressed their concern that although the rule requirements have been lightened up considerably, any emission reductions would be very small.
John DeWitt left at 10:20 a.m.
Agenda Item #3 – Year 2002 Goals & Objectives
Mr. Greg Adams distributed a draft handout of goals and objectives
for the committee. He stated that this handout was different from the one
that was included in the agenda package, because it had been updated with
comments that he received from the City of Los Angeles. Important issues
with regard to local government included: (1) CEQA Handbook Revision
Criteria; (2) Environmental Justice Developments; (3) Coordination among
SCAQMD's Air Quality Management Plan, California Air Resources Board’s Clean
Air Plan, and SCAG; (4) Monitoring Fleet Rule Implementation; and (5)
Enhanced Permit Streamlining. Ms. Dee Allen stated that these issues were
also important to small businesses in the cities and the way business is
done.
Important issues with regard to the small business community include: (1) Seek Reduction in Hearing Board Fees; (2) Create No-fault Inspection Service; (3) Reactivate Permit Amnesty Program; (4) Socioeconomic Report Re-Vamping; (5) Affordability in Minor Source BACT Determinations; (6) Administrative Changes to Explain Small Business Perspective; (7) Small Business Alternatives to SCAQMD Rulemaking (Partnering); and (8) Expansion of Minor Source Relocation without Triggering New Source Review.
This item will be brought back to the next meeting for prioritizing and assignment of tasks. Mr. Adams requested that comments be sent to him via email at gadams@lacsd.org.
Agenda Item #4 – CARB Environmental Justice Guideline Update
Mr. Greg Adams provided a handout at the meeting. Although it was
entitled "Proposed Policies and Actions for Environmental Justice" it
was in fact adopted by CARB. Ms. Dee Allen reported that CARB is putting
together their environmental justice advisory group to implement the
policies. Ms. Allen will report back to the committee on any updates she
receives.
Agenda Item #5 – CEQA Handbook Update
Dr. Steve Smith, Program Supervisor, gave the presentation to the
committee on the progress of revising the handbook. A copy of his
presentation was attached to the agenda. First, he reminded the committee
that when the handbook was originally adopted, the Board agreed that staff
would only return to the Board with handbook revisions if they involved
policy changes or new policies. Technical changes, such as updating emission
factors, do not require Board consideration. Because the handbook has not
been updated since 1993, the current revision to the handbook constitutes a
major revamping of the handbook, with approximately 90 percent of the
changes constituting technical revisions and 10 percent involving modified
or new policies.
One new policy associated with the current revision to the handbook is staff’s proposal to address localized air quality impacts by developing localized significance thresholds. Localized significance thresholds would be developed by AQMD using a dispersion model to back-calculate the emissions from a project that would cause or contribute to an exceedance of any ambient air quality standard at a sensitive receptor. Since localized significance thresholds are based on ambient concentrations, they would be developed for each source receptor area (SRA) in the district. AQMD would develop the localized significance thresholds in recognition of the fact that small cities or other small public agencies do not have the capability or the expertise to perform air quality modeling, which is necessary for identifying localized air quality impacts in their CEQA documents.
There are several policy implications associated with the localized significance thresholds. First, based on the actual methodology used to develop the localized significance thresholds, the thresholds might consist of very low daily emissions. Such low emissions may trigger a significance determination when analyzing air quality impacts in a CEQA document. As a result, projects that previously would have required preparation of a negative declaration would now require preparation of an environmental impact report (EIR), which is a more costly and time-consuming document. Further, because localized significance thresholds are based on ambient air quality concentrations (as determined by the local monitoring stations), different SRAs would have different localized significance thresholds. Different localized significance thresholds will influence the type of CEQA document necessary for a project, which, in turn, could influence the decision on where to locate a business. Staff is very sensitive to these issues and will take them into consideration when developing the localized significance thresholds.
Finally, at the suggestion of the Mobile Source Committee, AQMD staff has prepared a Board agenda item explaining the localized significance thresholds and policy implications of adopting these thresholds. Specifically, staff is seeking approval from the Board to continue developing the localized significance thresholds and reconvene the Handbook Revision Working Group to solicit input on the revised handbook. A draft of the revised handbook for public review is expected to be completed in March, with consideration by the Board in June or July of this year.
Board Member Ronald Loveridge left at 11:25 a.m.
Jeff Comerchero left at 11:40 a.m.
Agenda Item #7 – Update on Facility-Based Analysis
Mr. Scott Dawson, Air Quality Specialist, gave an overview of part
of the process that AQMD is undertaking to improve their socioeconomic
analysis. A copy of Mr. Dawson’s presentation was distributed at the
meeting. He stated that AQMD has consulted with BBC Research and Consulting
(an economics consulting firm). They are working on Proposed Rule 1137 and
Rule 1421. BBC was given seven tasks to complete; currently they are working
on task 4 (develop guidelines and methodology) and task 5 (test guidelines
and methodology) which are currently in draft form. Mr. Dawson said that the
problem with developing any of these assessments is the data availability.
BBC is using census data. Board Member Cynthia Verdugo-Peralta suggested
using other sources than just the census (i.e., SCAG). She felt that it was
important to have more realistic numbers in reference, not just the
financials, but also the true ownership of the facilities.
Mr. Gary Stafford requested that BBC meet again with the working group to review what stage they are at and to solicit their comments.
Mr. Adams requested that the staff report back with regard to the funds left in BBC's contract. The comment was made that the report should take into account regulations other than air quality that small businesses must comply with.
Agenda Item #8 – Year 2002 Meeting Schedule
The committee agreed to the proposed meeting schedule that was
attached to the agenda. The committee will meet on the third Friday of each
month at 9:30 a.m.
Agenda Item #9 – Other Business
Board Member Cynthia Verdugo-Peralta requested that an item be
placed on the agenda entitled "Compliance Issues" to discuss no-fault
inspections further and to have Mr. Peter Mieras present at the meeting. She
also requested that staff look into the status of her recommendation that
Mr. Bill LaMarr become a member of this committee.
Mr. Greg Adams requested that staff address the proposed changes to the particulate matter standards that have been drafted by both OEHHA and CARB (as a result of SB25). He requested that staff prepare a summary on how this would impact both local government and small businesses within AQMD with particular focus on what they would propose to do in terms of regulating stationary sources to bring them into compliance with these changes.
Agenda Item 10 – Public Comment
No comments were received.
Agenda Item 11 – Adjournment
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 12:00
p.m.
/ / /