Stationary Source Committee
SYNOPSIS:
The Stationary Source Committee met Friday, November 22, 2002. Following is a summary of that meeting. The next meeting will be January 24, 2003, at 10:30 a.m., in Conference Room CC8.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Receive and file.
Jon Mikels, Acting Chair
Stationary Source Committee
Attendance
The meeting began at 10:35 a.m. Present were members Jon Mikels, acting Chair (left meeting 11:20 a.m.), Jane Carney, (chaired after 11:20 a.m.), and Cynthia Verdugo-Peralta, and Dr. William Burke by videoteleconference. Absent were Ron Loveridge, Norma Glover and Leonard Paulitz.
INFORMATIONAL ITEMS
This proposed rule has been actively under development for about a year and has employed an industry/staff working group, multiple workshops and consultation meetings and has been one of the topics for the Chairman's Ad Hoc Refinery Committee.
The proposed rule will establish emission standards for filterable PM10 and ammonia. Although a standard for condensable particulate has been considered, it will be identified for further study in this proposal, to allow resolution of significant issues. Although a condensable standard will not be proposed, the filterable PM10 and ammonia standards are expected to result in reductions of the condensable particulate emissions as well.
Staff is continuing to work the proposal with the affected parties and has targeted March 2003 for public hearing and consideration by the Board.
Dr. Chang further described the current approach for air toxics, the AQMD's many existing integrated programs, and recent subregional analyses related to toxics. Staff's concepts for design principles include no redlining, not interfering with local land use decision authority, assuring timely permitting and CEQA decisions, and give attention to resource considerations. Five options have been identified through preliminary staff brainstorming which were briefly described. Staff believes this will facilitate discussions with stakeholders.
Staff stated that ARB was supportive of AQMD's efforts in this area. Preliminary input from the industry groups included establishing a joint working group and limiting the scope to cancer impacts. Three additional design principles were suggested: certainty, a risk-based rather than an emission-based approach, and a programmatic or holistic approach. Industry groups suggested updating MATES II data based on recent regulatory actions and that EJ or disproportionate areas be defined to help establish priorities. There was also a suggestion made that AQMD recommend reductions from mobile sources.
Staff also had a brainstorming meeting with several environmental and community groups for their preliminary input. An additional brainstorming session was recommended with environmental and community groups before establishing a joint working group. The environmental and community groups would also like to include chronic impacts and particulates. These groups recommend analyzing broad areas around facilities and designing mitigation for narrow areas. Regarding input on design principles, it was recommended that AQMD should work to influence land use decisions; consider cross media impacts and coordinate with other agencies, and develop programs to enable growth in EJ areas only if there is no pollution increase.
Regarding land use, Ms. Verdugo-Peralta asked what agencies can we help with better decisions, such as schools. Dr. Chang responded that this can be addressed through CEQA and working with other agencies.
Ms. Carney asked if enhancements to CEQA will be proposed in January. Dr. Chang clarified that this looks like a promising option that would not require rule development. In January, staff will seek Board direction to proceed with a variety of options.
In January, staff will recommend: (1) taking more time to evaluate these issues, and (2) bringing a white paper with more specific recommendations to the Board in June. Rule development could then proceed.
In the Basin, there are approximately 135 facilities doing chrome plating, approximately 180 facilities that are doing nickel plating, and approximately 65 facilities doing cadmium plating. The risks from these facilities range from <10 to >100 in a million. To reduce emissions from chrome plating, the following items are being discussed: certifying fume suppressants, upgrading or adding controls, and considering additional requirements for facilities near residences or sensitive receptors. The negotiated rule working group is making progress toward developing a consensus proposal.
For Proposed Rule 1426, a two-step process is recommended. The process for reducing emissions from other metals include data collection, assessing needs for controls for future rule development, working with industry to streamline collection of process data, and housekeeping and operational requirements. After evaluation, amendments to Rule 1426 to add control requirements could be proposed. Future meetings include additional working group and subcommittee meetings, a Set Hearing in January 2003, and a Public Hearing in February 2003. A report on the pilot negotiated rulemaking process will be discussed at the Board Meeting in March 2003.
WRITTEN REPORTS
All written reports were acknowledged by the Committee.
The meeting was adjourned at 11:30 a.m.
November 22, 2002 Committee Agenda (without attachments)
/ / /