![]() |
BOARD MEETING DATE: May 2, 2003
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PROPOSAL:
SYNOPSIS:
COMMITTEE:
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Barry R. Wallerstein, D.Env. Background A financial audit is annually performed on the AQMD in compliance with the California Government Code and Single Audit Act of 1996. This audit is performed by independent Certified Public Accountants, and their reports are addressed to the Board. Outreach In accordance with the AQMDs consulting and contracting policies, a public notice advertising the RFP and inviting bids was published in the following publications:
Additionally, potential bidders were notified utilizing the Los Angeles County MTA Directory of Certified Firms, the Inland Area Opportunity Pages Ethnic/Women Business & Professional Directory; and AQMDs own electronic listing of certified minority vendors. Notice of the RFP was mailed to the Black and Latino Legislative Caucuses and various minority chambers of commerce and business associations; and placed on the Internet at AQMDs Web site [http://www.aqmd.gov, "Business and Job Opportunities" icon, or http://www.aqmd.gov/busjob/ ] and AQMDs bidders 24-hour telephone message line (909) 396-2724. Bid Evaluation Fifty-eight copies of RFP #P2003-24 were mailed out. Three (3) quotations were received when the bidding closed at 3 p.m. on March 12, 2003. An evaluation panel was convened to evaluate the three proposals and consisted of a Principal Account Auditor from the County of Los Angeles and three AQMD staff: a Senior Deputy District Counsel, a Financial Analyst, and the Controller. The panel consisted of two females and two males; one Asian Pacific American and and
three Caucasian. After technical evaluation, one firm was eliminated as it did not meet the minimum requirements of the RFP. The evaluation results for the remaining bidders are as follows:
*Total maximum points of 110 The selection criteria used to rank the proposals included: responsiveness to the RFP: technical expertise; project management and technical approach; previous experience; cost; and SB/SBJV/DVBE/DVBEJV/DVBE/SB Subcontractors/Local Business designation (non-EPA). Based on the panels assessment of the criteria, the two proposals were recommended to the Administrative Committee for its consideration and recommendation to the full Board. When the RFP process is initiated again in three years, staff will take additional steps to expand its outreach to ensure a greater pool of qualified candidates. Resource Impacts The maximum audit costs, including out-of pocket expenses are $24,800, $24,800, and $24,800, for FYs ending June 30, 2003, 2004, and 2005, respectively. This represents a maximum cost of the three-year period of $74,400. Sufficient funds for the first year of the contract are included in the FY 2003-2004 Budget Proposal and will be budgeted for in the second and third years. / / / |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||