![]() |
BOARD MEETING DATE: November 7, 2003
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PROPOSAL:
SYNOPSIS:
COMMITTEES:
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Barry R. Wallerstein, D.Env. Background Currently, the AQMD contracts with Copeland, Lowery, Jacquez, Denton & Shockey, LLC for legislative representation in Washington, D.C. The contract expires December 31, 2003. On June 6, 2003, AQMD released RFP #12003-38 to solicit proposals for legislative representation in Washington, D.C. The AQMD, as the largest local air quality agency in the United States and a leader in air quality innovations, is an important contributor to the federal policymaking debate. This agency needs to maintain a continued presence in Washington, D.C. to engage in the resolution of federal Clean Air Act implementation issues and see that they are resolved in a timely and meaningful manner and to ensure continued involvement in policy development relating to allocation of federal resources to local agencies. Outreach In accordance with the AQMDs consulting and contracting policies, a public notice advertising the RFP and inviting bids was published in the following publications:
Additionally, potential bidders were identified using the Los Angeles County MTA and Cal Trans Directories of Certified Minority, Women, Disadvantaged and Disabled Veterans Business Enterprises; the Inland Area Opportunity Pages Ethnic/Women Business & Professional Directory; AQMDs own electronic listing of certified minority vendors; and AQMD Purchasings mailing list. Notice of the RFP was mailed to the Black and Latino Legislative Caucuses, various minority chambers of commerce and business associations, placed on the Internet at AQMDs Web site [http://www.aqmd.gov, "Business & Job Opportunities" icon], and on AQMDs 24-hour telephone message line for bidders. Bid Evaluation Three proposals were received in response to the RFP. The proposals were evaluated and scored by a four-member evaluation panel. All of the proposals evaluated received qualifying scores and were forwarded to the Legislative Committee for their consideration. As a result of the panel evaluation, the National Group West, LLC scored 101; Copeland, Lowery, Jacquez, Denton & Shockey, LLC received a score of 90, and Charlene A. Sturbitts scored 88. The attached matrix reflects the panel evaluation of the three proposals. Panel Composition The evaluation panel consisted of the Executive Vice President of Public Affairs for the Orange County Business Council, AQMD Executive Officer, District Counsel, and Assistant Deputy Executive Officer for Public Affairs. Of these, three are Caucasian and one is Hispanic; two are female and two are male. Committee Discussion At the Legislative Committee meeting held October 10, 2003, Committee Chair Beatrice LaPisto-Kirtley, Committee Vice-Chair Jane Carney, and Committee members Michael Antonovich, William Burke and Roy Wilson interviewed three firms: the National Group West, LLC; Copeland, Lowery, Jacquez, Denton & Shockey, LLC; and Charlene A. Sturbitts, Esq. The firms had earlier been ranked in terms of technical expertise. The Committee felt that Copeland, Lowery, Jacquez, Denton & Shockey, LLC most strongly presented the necessary depth and knowledge of the AQMD and how best to represent this agency in Washington, D.C. The committee members also agreed that they expect regular personal communication, periodic briefings for the Board Chairman, and a close working relationship with the firm selected. The Legislative Committee voted unanimously to recommend that the Governing Board award a new contract for legislative representation in Washington, D.C. to Copeland, Lowery, Jacquez, Denton & Shockey, LLC for one year, for an amount not to exceed $129,000/year, with an option to renew for up to two additional one-year terms. The Administrative Committee concurred with this recommendation. Resource Impacts The funding for the first six months of this contract is included in the FY 2003-04 Budget. Funding for the remainder of the first year and the optional second and third year renewals will be proposed as part of the Budget for the respective fiscal years. Evaluation Matrix / / / |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||