![]() |
BOARD MEETING DATE: January 9, 2004
|
REPORT:
SYNOPSIS:
COMMITTEE:
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Barry R. Wallerstein, D.Env. Background Rule 1401 New Source Review of Toxic Air Contaminants establishes permitting requirements for new, relocated and modified sources that emit one or more of the toxic air contaminants (TACs) listed in the rule. The Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) establishes risk values for TACs. The Scientific Review Panel (SRP) reviews and approves the methodologies used to develop these risk values, thereby finalizing these values for use by state and local agencies in assessing risk from exposures to TACs. This approval is considered final action by the state. Rule 1401(e)(2) and (e)(3) requires an analysis and report to the Board before new and updated risk factors, respectively, are used for new source review. This includes a requirement for the AQMD to bring proposed amendments to the rule to update the list of TACs within 150 days of final action by OEHHA. Rule 1402 Control of Toxic Air Contaminants from Existing Sources, requires a report to the Governing Board within 150 days of final action by OEHHA on the potential impacts of the changes before new or updated risk factors are used for risk assessments in Rule 1402. Rule 1401 and 1402 Impact Assessment On June 20, 2003, the SRP approved the chronic reference exposure level (REL) risk values for fluorides, including hydrogen fluoride. The final technical support documents were subsequently released by OEHHA on August 15, 2003. However, OEHHAs analysis did not include a multi-pathway assessment as it has in the past. Consequently an impact assessment cannot be completed as required by Rules 1401 and 1402. The multi-pathway analysis is needed to complete both the impact assessment and the analysis required for permitting purposes. OEHHA is currently working to complete the multi-pathway assessment; once finished, it will go through a public comment process. The multi-pathway factor is especially important for fluorides as there are two routes (oral and inhalation) of exposure associated with them. The additional (oral) route of exposure has a compounding effect on the potential risk associated with the inhalation of emissions. Conclusion At this time staff is unable to evaluate whether any additional facilities would be subject to either Rule 1401 or 1402. In addition, the actual permit evaluation cannot proceed. On this basis, staff recommends postponing the Rule 1401 amendment and Rule 1402 analysis until 150 days after OEHHA has finalized the multi-pathway assessment. / / /
|
|