![]() |
BOARD MEETING DATE: November 5, 2004
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PROPOSAL:
SYNOPSIS:
COMMITTEE:
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Barry R. Wallerstein, D.Env. Background AB 2766, chaptered into law as Health and Safety Code Sections 44220-44247 was enacted to authorize air pollution control districts to impose fees on motor vehicles. These fees are to be expended specifically for the purpose of mobile source air pollution reduction measures pursuant to the California Clean Air Act of 1988 or the AQMDs AQMP pursuant to Article 5 of Chapter 5.5 of Part 3 of the Health and Safety Code. Health and Safety Code Section 44244.1(a) states that any agency receiving fee revenues pursuant to Section 44243 or 44244 shall, at least once every two years, be subject to an audit of each program or project funded. The audit is to be conducted by an independent auditor selected by the AQMD in accordance with Division 2 (commencing with Section 1100) of the Public Contract Code. Audit program guidelines for local government recipients of fee revenues under Health and Safety Code Sections 44220-44247 were prepared by the AQMD with input from the Technical Advisory Committee Audit Subcommittee of the IAIC, representatives of the Finance Committee of the League of California Cities and with CPA firms whose clients include local governments. These audit guidelines were approved by the IAIC, MSRC and by the Board on December 4, 1992 and further revised and approved in January 1995, and again in August 2003. This is the sixth biennial audit of these fee revenues and covers FYs 2001-02 and 2002-03. Proposal On July 9, 2004, the Board approved an RFP to conduct the biennial audit of recipients of AB 2766 fee revenues. The audit will cover recipients in all three segments of the AB 2766 fee distribution to determine whether the fee revenues collected in FYs 2001-02 and 2002-03 were spent on the reduction of pollution from motor vehicles as described above. The primary purpose of the audit is to set forth an opinion regarding the propriety of the expenditures incurred, not the degree of efficacy in reducing air pollution. Outreach In accordance with AQMDs Procurement Policy and Procedure, a public notice advertising the RFP/RFQ and inviting bids was published in the following publications:
Additionally, potential bidders were notified utilizing the Los Angeles County MTA Directory of Certified Firms, the Inland Area Opportunity Pages Ethnic/Women Business & Professional Directory; and AQMDs own electronic listing of certified minority vendors. Notice of the RFP/RFQ was mailed to the Black and Latino Legislative Caucuses and various minority chambers of commerce and business associations, and placed on the Internet at AQMDs Web site (http://www.aqmd.gov where it could be viewed by making menu selections "Inside AQMD"/"Employment and Business Opportunities"/"Business Opportunities" or by going directly to http://www.aqmd.gov/rfp/index.html). Information was also available on AQMDs bidders 24-hour telephone message line (909) 396-2724. Bid Evaluation The AQMD received a total of two proposals by the 1:00 p.m., August 27, 2004 deadline which were evaluated by a technically qualified panel in accordance with criteria contained in the RFP. Panel Composition An evaluation panel was convened to evaluate the two proposals and consisted of a representative from local governments; a representative from the MSRC; and three AQMD staff, the Controller and two Financial Analysts. Of the five panelists that scored the proposals, one is Asian Pacific Islander and four are Caucasian; three are female, two are male. Of the two proposals received, both were rated technically qualified and were scored for cost. The evaluation results for the two proposals are:
The selection criteria used to rank the proposals included responsiveness to the RFP; technical expertise; qualifications and experience; past performance; cost; and SB/SBJV/DVBE/DVBEJV/DVBE/SB subcontractors/local business designation (non-EPA). Based on the panels assessment of the criteria, Cobb, Bazilio & Associates, PC was selected to be recommended to the full Board. Resource Impacts: The maximum audit cost is $77,550. The total audit costs will be borne by the entities being audited as follows:
/ / / |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||