![]() |
BOARD MEETING DATE: January 7, 2005
|
PROPOSAL:
SYNOPSIS:
COMMITTEE:
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Barry R. Wallerstein, D.Env. Background In 1990, Congress enacted amendments to the Federal Clean Air Act, including Section 103 Small Business Ombudsman/Small Business Technical Assistance Programs (SBO/SBTAP), which seeks to support states in providing outreach and technical assistance to help small businesses comply with clean air regulations. In response to this need, Congress authorized the U.S. EPA to expend a total of one million dollars nationwide to assist SBO/SBTAPs to develop and implement technical outreach projects and to measure their performance outcomes. As part of this effort, the U.S. EPA originally approved $100,000 in matching funds for AQMD to lead a project not to exceed $195,600 intended to reduce emissions from boilers in coordination with other small business offices in Arizona, Hawaii, and Nevada. However, the project was successfully completed at the reduced cost of $115,696. This action is intended to appropriate 52% of matching revenue from U.S. EPA of $60,161 and to reimburse incidental project expenditures, including boiler tune-ups, printing, graphic arts and distribution costs of $24,219 to the Planning, Rule Development and Area Sources FY 2004-05 Budget and the remainder to the general fund to reimburse Salary and Employee Benefits for FY 2003-04 and FY 2004-05. Objectives The purpose of this project has been to quantify emission reductions and energy savings resulting from scheduled tune-ups to small boilers rated between 400,000 to 2,000,000 Btu/hour. A follow-up outreach program was conducted that addressed the tune-up benefits to small business operators such as dry cleaners, food processors, schools and residential and commercial buildings. These small business boilers are significant sources of NOx and CO emissions. Implementation The project has been implemented in four phases:
Fiscal Impacts These grant funds are a supplement to the FY 2004-05 Budget, and as such, have no negative impact on the Budget. Adequate staffing resources are available to implement the project as presented. / / / |
|