![]() |
BOARD MEETING DATE: February 2, 2007
|
||||||||||||||||||
PROPOSAL:
SYNOPSIS:
COMMITTEE:
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS:
Barry R. Wallerstein, D.Env. Background At its September 2006 meeting, the Board authorized release of RFP #P2007-07 soliciting cost-shared proposals from school districts and joint power authorities for installing natural gas fueling and maintenance facilities. Funds generated under AB 923 for the AQMD’s Lower-Emission School Bus Replacement Program have been made available in the past for funding of up to 10 percent of bus purchase awards for CNG fueling infrastructure. However, the cost of CNG fueling infrastructure and necessary garage upgrades can be quite burdensome for school districts. The identified economic burden may severely limit the use and expansion of clean fuel CNG buses by local school districts, increasing the risk and exposure of children to toxic diesel particulate matter and smog-forming pollutants. Expansion of the natural gas fueling infrastructure is needed to support school bus fleet fueling needs and support future incentive program awards such as the Chairman’s School Bus Replacement Initiative and the Carl Moyer Program. The Board approved a total of $2 million to support the RFP. Funding is designed to offset capital investment costs of fueling infrastructure and garage or maintenance facility upgrades. For this RFP, funding was only provided for natural gas fueling infrastructure. Applications were accepted from school districts and joint power authorities providing transportation for students and school districts. Additional scoring consideration was given to those applicants that provide public access. Funding of natural gas fueling infrastructure was offered to school districts totaling up to 75% of the cost of the new or upgraded equipment and/or system. The level of cost share was scored based upon the amount of grant funds requested including cash expenditures by the applicant, (i.e. equipment, engineering, permits, installation, etc.) less all available fuel savings, manufacturer, equipment and fuel tax credits, and other infrastructure award moneys through AB 923 (Low Emission School Bus Program). In-kind services were limited to 10 percent with the exception of actual installation by school district staff. Staff has met with all the school bus vendors and discussed the issue of potential tax credits allowed under the Energy Bill. The general requirements of the RFP are identified below:
All awardees are to be contractually obligated to the proposed station’s throughput. Proposal As mentioned above, eight proposals were received by the RFP deadline of October 27, 2006. All proposals received in response to RFP #2007-07 were evaluated and scored by a diverse, technically qualified panel in accordance with criteria contained in the RFP. The evaluation panel’s technical scores for each proposal are provided in Attachment A. One of the eight proposals was deemed unresponsive.
In addition to any funding provided by the AQMD, school districts have available a number of mechanisms that allow up to 100% of the project funding. These other mechanisms include the following:
Benefits to AQMD The AQMP relies on the expedited implementation of advanced technologies and clean-burning fuels in Southern California to achieve air quality standards. School buses operate in close proximity to students, teachers and neighbors. Many schools provide bus services in heavily populated areas. The successful implementation of the school bus replacement program will provide less polluting and safer school transportation for school children. In addition, the program will maximize the potential emission benefits in low income, high diesel and high PM10 exposure areas, and will enhance the objectives of the Environmental Justice and Children’s Health Initiatives adopted by the Board. Outreach In accordance with AQMD’s Procurement Policy and Procedure, a public notice advertising the RFP/RFQ and inviting bids was published in the Los Angeles Times, the Orange County Register, the San Bernardino Sun, and Riverside County Press Enterprise newspapers to leverage the most cost-effective method of outreach to the entire South Coast Basin. Additionally, potential bidders may have been notified utilizing AQMD’s own electronic listing of certified minority vendors. Notice of the RFP/RFQ have been mailed to the Black and Latino Legislative Caucuses and various minority chambers of commerce and business associations, the State of California Contracts Register website, and placed on the Internet at AQMD’s Web site (http://www.aqmd.gov/). Information was also available on AQMD’s bidder’s 24-hour telephone message line (909) 396-2724. Bid Evaluation Proposals received were evaluated by a diverse, technically qualified panel in accordance with criteria contained in the RFP. The evaluation panel consisted of a representative from CARB, an independent technical expert, a representative from the California Energy Commission and an AQMD Program Supervisor. The panel make-up was four Caucasian; two female and two male. Attachment A provides a summary of the proposals received ranked by the scores received from the evaluation panel Resource Impacts Total funding for the project will be made available from the Clean Fuels Fund in an amount not to exceed $2,526,553. The Clean Fuels Fund was established as a special revenue fund resulting from the state-mandated Clean Fuels program. The Clean Fuels Program, under Health and Safety Code Sections 40448.5 and 40512 and Vehicle Code Section 9250.11, established mechanisms to collect revenues from mobile sources to support projects to increase the utilization of clean fuels, including the development of the necessary advanced enabling technologies. Funds collected from motor vehicles are restricted, by statute, to be used for projects and program activities related to mobile sources that support the objectives of the Clean Fuels Program. Attachment
(DOC 43.5 kb) |
|||||||||||||||||||